· Essential Questions for Twelve Angry Men – Pre-reading Questions 1. How do people change based on the personalities contained in a group? People can change based on the personalities contained in a group · Twelve Angry Men Questions from the Film The character with the most effective critical thinking skills was Juror #8. Clearly #8 is the most thoughtful and analytical of all the jurors · Essay Topics ‘The relationship between 3rd and 8th jurors is the most important element in Twelve Angry Men.’ Do you agree? ‘Twelve Angry Men extols the virtues of a judicial system based on compassionate, reasoned decision made by ordinary people.’ blogger.comted Reading Time: 3 mins
12 Angry Men: Sample essays (justice/jurors) - English Works
Whilst Rose suggests that the judicial system has its imperfections, he also endorses the benefits he claims are invaluable to society. Initially, 12 angry men essay questions the jurors respond to the task of judging the guilt or innocence of the 16 year old boy, charged with first degree murder of his father, shortcomings are flagrantly obvious.
However, owing to the integrity and perspicacity of the 8 th juror and his insistence the principles of justice and reasonable doubt, he orchestrates a careful examination of the circumstantial evidence.
As Rose clearly shows, honouring these safeguards not only empowers individuals to engage in the judicial process, but acts as the basis for a just verdict which reflects a decent, caring democratic society; diversity may 12 angry men essay questions, but in this case it can facilitate also justice, 12 angry men essay questions.
Specifically, and through the use of a real-time deliberation process, the playwright emphasizes how the integrity of the judicial system is undermined when the jurors arrive at the table clothed in their own personal experiences and prejudices. quote from the 10 th. Rose deliberately constructs a parallel story for the 3rd Juror, whose broken relationship with his son, influences his decision.
Climate of prejudice; a fault that Rose implies was a pressing issue in trials conducted during the post-war era of McCarthy-style hysteria. Another shortcoming is the legal competence of the jurors, many of whom lack the aptitude to carry out their duties because they have a distorted or deficient understanding of their legal duties. Rose suggests this attitude, which is compounded by the heat, is counterproductive to the notion of active citizenship.
In order to overcome these innate limitations, Rose suggests that the emphasis on and adherence to the safeguards are essential assets to the deliberation process. In the right context and circumstances, Rose also suggests that diversity, a hallmark of democracy, can hinder, but can also facilitate justice. The gradual self-awareness and enlightenment of many of the jurors helps the collective team more effectively scrutinise the evidence. In many ways, such diversity of provides a plethora of contexts for identification which in turn helps the jurors gain an insight into the flaws of the evidence.
Therefore, a focus on the safeguards yields benefits beyond the achievement of justice, 12 angry men essay questions. The process can empower the disempowered and act as a resounding model for a democratic society. Indeed, self aware individuals prove useful in directing the discussion away from extreme and potentially divisive views.
However, the play serves as a source of inspiration to the strength of the judicial process should the principles of justice be appropriately upheld. Ultimately the concept of reasonable doubt affords the best protection against the miscarriage of justice. Only when the safeguards of democracy are consciously followed, can any reward be in sight.
Rose characterises the 8 th juror as a spokesperson for justice because he foregrounds the concept of reasonable doubt; Rose thereby suggests that this provdes the best safeguard of the legal system. Ironically, the 8 th juror seems to be the only one who best abides by this nameless system. Rose thereby suggests that the emphasis must be on the boy and the irrefutable nature of his crime. Rose sets up the 8 th juror as a contrasting voice of dissent in order to expose the extent to which the other jurors are controlled by their preconceived notions of guilt and innocence.
Despite his insistence to scrutinise the evidence, other jurors still base their votes on biases, attitudes and personal experiences, 12 angry men essay questions. Hence, owing to preconceived biases, jurors are too quick to arrive at hasty conclusions and are less willing to accept the apparent doubt in the circumstantial evidence. 12 angry men essay questions does not know and he never will.
Likewise, the 3 rd is forced to recognise the degree to which his personal vendetta interfered with the decision-making process. The deconstruction of these obstacles finally paves the way for an honest and just outcome. The unlocking of the door and the knife in the table — which was critical to the fact-finding process — suggest that prejudice has been dispelled.
Thus Rose would suggest they reach a fair and reasonable verdict. Rose demonstrates this though 12 angry men essay questions jury, a microcosm representation of a cross-section of America, who works together to form a just, unanimous decision.
quote from the 10 th Rose deliberately constructs a parallel story for the 3rd Juror, whose broken relationship with his son, influences his decision. Knife… Climate of prejudice; a fault that Rose implies was a pressing issue in trials conducted during the post-war era of McCarthy-style hysteria. The strengths of the system because of the emphasis on the safeguards of justice In order to overcome these innate limitations, 12 angry men essay questions, Rose suggests that the emphasis on and adherence to the safeguards are essential assets to the deliberation process.
Footer For Sponsorship and Other Enquiries Please contact English Works Ph: or email: jminter englishworks. au Original artwork by Kelly Bull. Keep in touch, 12 angry men essay questions.
12 Angry Men - The Impact Of Reasonable Doubt
, time: 4:42“Twelve Angry Men” Revision – Essay Topics | Ms Rogers' Resources
· Twelve Angry Men Questions from the Film The character with the most effective critical thinking skills was Juror #8. Clearly #8 is the most thoughtful and analytical of all the jurors 12 Angry Men Essay Questions 1 How does Rose maintain doubt as to the defendant's guilt or innocence throughout the play? Rose accomplishes this 2 Explain how the idea of 'reasonable doubt' particularly pertains to this case. In the American criminal system, those 3 Give examples of how the Author: Reginald Rose · 12 Angry Men, starring Henry Fonda, E.G. Marshall, and Lee Cobb, is the story of twelve jurors who determine the fate of a teenage Puerto Rican boy charged with murdering his own father. In the wake of a week-long trial, twelve men, who remain nameless throughout the movie, convene in a small, sweltering room in a New York City court building
No comments:
Post a Comment